Monthly Archives: March 2012

What To Do When A Prospective Employer Request Your Facebook Login Info?

I recently received an email with a link to an article pertaining to employers current hiring and interviewing practice of requesting that prospective hires provide their Facebook user name and password. The original article can be found by clicking on this link – Can Employers Legally Ask You for Your Facebook Password When You Apply for a Job? Why Congress and the States Should Prohibit This Practice. As the title indicates, this article concerns itself with what legislators and courts can do and are doing about this questionable employment hiring practice.

The question remains however, what is a prospective employee to do if confronted by a prospective employer in this manner?

As an employment law attorney, I recently addressed this issue, in an article captioned Facebook Privacy – A Prospective Employer’s Request For Your Log-in Info?. The essence of my recommendation to those on the job market is that, until the law is settled on this issue, it is best that you be prepared for this type of request, with a professional and dignified response. Please check out my article for a more detailed assessment of this issue.

In conclusion, this is a very interesting topic, from both a legislative and an employment standpoint, and I am eager to read any relevant comments, anecdotes and ultimately to see how this landscape evolves over time.

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Conservatives’ War on Women?

I simply do not understand the enormous kerfuffle about some, what I would call, “insensitive” remarks by Rush Limbaugh about Sandra Fluke. What is more perplexing is how the ill-thought-out attempt by him at humor, satire or critical analysis (whatever you wish to call it) is being extrapolated by the media as an indication that conservatives are waging a war on women. Rush Limbaugh is NOT the voice of all conservatives. Nor is his satire and commentary, which is for entertainment purposes much more than purporting to be “news,” representative of the firm political doctrine or dogma of the “right,” as the media and pundits on the left seem to imply. Frankly, I personally rarely listen to him, as much of his commentary is silly satire and dumbed down for mass consumption.

Limbaugh’s “commentary” is simply that – the personal opinions and commentary of an entertainer, reflecting his own personal brand. Frankly, I think it is ridiculous that he was forced to apologize, by his PR, the media, politicians, etc. for comments that were clearly satiric and sarcastic, but aimed at causing his listeners to undertake a small amount of critical thinking about the issues addressed by Ms. Fluke. Just as Mr. Limbaugh is merely an entertainment “personality”, so to is Mr. Louis C.K. a purported entertainer. He similarly attempts comedy by commenting on political figures, such as his attacks on Sarah Palin. If you have not heard his commentary on Palin, you can listen to a segment (*WARNING – very foul language*)here, which includes the 30-60 second clip of his comments followed by some additional commentary from the Youtuber who posted it (no endorsement intended or implied). However, the media and politicians did not clamor for apologies from the entertainer for his far more graphic and derogatory, if not out-right disgusting comments about a woman politician. Nor did the media reach even further to extrapolate out some “larger issue” of women-hating by liberals or liberals war against mentally disabled children, or anything of the sort. Bill Maher has similarly made exceedingly derogatory and foul comments about Ms. Palin, which only came to light now, because of the equivalency pointed out as backlash to the media’s double standard.

Listening to Ms. Fluke’s comments in the first place, she entreats that women, or more specifically in her case, law-school students are entitled to thousands of dollars of birth control annually, for recreational purposes, to be provided for free by the government using our tax dollars.

As a conservative, I will not call Ms. Fluke the foul name associated with loose morals, but I will suggest that law-school students or anyone else for that matter, male or female, are not entitled to government (tax-dollar) provided birth control for recreational purposes. With choices come responsibility. If a person chooses to engage in sexual relations, that is their choice and with that choice comes the risk of pregnancy, disease, etc. In making such decisions, one must be accountable for their own choices. Why must the government designate our tax dollars to fund the promiscuity of young college women who wish to have recreational sex? This is not a case of conservatives waging a war against women – it is another instance of conservatives suggesting that people should accept responsibility for their own choices. It is not an instance of preventing women’s access to healthcare, as the media has construed it. Clearly the medicinal use of birth control for more legitimate medical (as opposed to purely recreational) purposes, was not what Ms. Fluke was seeking in her address, nor was it the target of conservative reaction.

Summing it all up – conservative principles demand that people take responsibility for their own choices and actions. The conservative objection to the government using our tax dollars to provide birth control to women for purely recreational purposes is not morally equivalent (or even remotely similar) to preventing access to healthcare for women. Moreover, the phony and hyperbolic outrage of the media and liberal pundits over Limbaugh’s off-color sarcastic comments calling a woman, who wants the government to pay for her recreational sex, a promiscuous woman, should be gauged in the light of the utter silence over similar derogatory comments by liberal entertainers about women (e.g. Bill Maher, Louis C.K., et al.).

1 Comment

Filed under Current Events

WV Appointed Criminal Counsel Voucher Form

Any criminal defense attorneys in WV who accept appointments, understands the joy (*tongue in cheek*) of completing the Defense Counsel Voucher Forms provided by the West Virginia Public Defender Service. Unfortunately, the forms provided on their website are not very useful, in the sense of not being terribly user friendly. If you have fought through the frustration of filling out the forms, and have not found the time or resources to modify their forms for your own law firm’s use, then you may find our newest resource that we posted to our website useful. Please check our our easy to use, fillable West Virginia Criminal Defense Counsel Voucher Form.

We took the Order Approving Payment of Appointed Counsel Fees & Expenses” form and converted it to a fillable PDF form, which allows you to easily tab through all of the form fields necessary to complete the form. Next, we took the portion of the Voucher form for your Itemized Statement of Legal Services, and added more functionality to that portion. Please click the link above to visit this valuable resource for appointed criminal defense counsel in the State of WV for more information.

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized